Last updated at 12:49 PM on 25th January 2010
Vital evidence which could solve the mystery of the death of Government weapons inspector Dr David Kelly will be kept under wraps for up to 70 years.
In a draconian – and highly unusual – order, Lord Hutton, the peer who chaired the controversial inquiry into the Dr Kelly scandal, has secretly barred the release of all medical records, including the results of the post mortem, and unpublished evidence.
The move, which will stoke fresh speculation about the true circumstances of Dr Kelly’s death, comes just days before Tony Blair appears before the Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq War.
It is also bound to revive claims of an establishment cover-up and fresh questions about the verdict that Dr Kelly killed himself.
Tonight, Dr Michael Powers QC, a doctor campaigning to overturn the Hutton findings, said: ‘What is it about David Kelly’s death which is so secret as to justify these reports being kept out of the public domain for 70 years?’
Campaigning Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker, who has also questioned the verdict that Dr Kelly committed suicide, said: ‘It is astonishing this is the first we’ve known about this decision by Lord Hutton and even more astonishing he should have seen fit to hide this material away.’
Whistle-blower: Dr Kelly died after casting doubt on Government claims about Saddam's weaponsThe body of former United Nations weapons inspector Dr Kelly was found in July 2003 in woods close to his Oxfordshire home, shortly after he was exposed as the source of a BBC news report questioning the Government’s claims that
Saddam Hussein had an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, which could be deployed within 45 minutes.
Lord Hutton’s 2004 report, commissioned by Mr Blair, concluded that Dr Kelly killed himself by cutting his wrist with a blunt gardening knife.Tragic: Forensic experts at work in the Oxfordshire woods where Dr Kelly's body was found in 2003
It was dismissed by many experts as a whitewash for clearing the Government of any culpability, despite evidence that it had leaked Dr Kelly’s name in an attempt to smear him.
Only now has it emerged that a year after his inquiry was completed, Lord Hutton took unprecedented action to ensure that the vital evidence remains a state secret for so long.
A letter, leaked to The Mail on Sunday, revealed that a 30-year ban was placed on ‘records provided [which were] not produced in evidence’. This is thought to refer to witness statements given to the inquiry which were not disclosed at the time.
In addition, it has now been established that Lord Hutton ordered all medical reports – including the post-mortem findings by pathologist Dr Nicholas Hunt and photographs of Dr Kelly’s body – to remain classified information for 70 years.The normal rules on post-mortems allow close relatives and ‘properly interested persons’ to apply to see a copy of the report and to ‘inspect’ other documents.
Lord Hutton’s measure has overridden these rules, so the files will not be opened until all such people are likely to be dead.
Last night, the Ministry of Justice was unable to explain the legal basis for Lord Hutton’s order.
The restrictions came to light in a letter from the legal team of Oxfordshire County Council to a group of doctors who are challenging the Hutton verdict.
Last year, a group of doctors, including Dr Powers, compiled a medical dossier as part of their legal challenge to the Hutton verdict.
They argue that Hutton’s conclusion that Dr Kelly killed himself by severing the ulnar artery in his left wrist after taking an overdose of prescription painkillers is untenable because the artery is small and difficult to access, and severing it could not have caused death.
In their 12-page opinion, they concluded: ‘The bleeding from Dr Kelly’s ulnar artery is highly unlikely to have been so voluminous and rapid that it was the cause of death. We advise the instructing solicitors to obtain the autopsy reports so that the concerns of a group of properly interested medical specialists can be answered.’
Tonight, Dr Powers, a former assistant coroner, added: ‘Supposedly all evidence relevant to the cause of death has been heard in public at the time of Lord Hutton’s inquiry. If these secret reports support the suicide finding, what could they contain that could be so sensitive?’
The letter disclosing the 70-year restriction was written by Nick Graham, assistant head of legal and democratic services at Oxfordshire Council.
It states: ‘Lord Hutton made a request for the records provided to the inquiry, not produced in evidence, to be closed for 30 years, and that medical (including post-mortem) reports and photographs be closed for 70 years.’
Speaking to The Mail on Sunday today, he said: ‘I know that Lord Hutton made that recommendation. Someone told me at the time. Anybody concerned will be dead by then, and that is quite clearly Lord Hutton’s intention.’
Asked what was in the records that made it necessary for them to be embargoed, Mr Gardiner said: ‘They’re Lord Hutton’s records not mine. You’d have to ask him.’
He added that in his opinion Lord Hutton had embargoed the records to protect Dr Kelly’s children.
The inquest into Dr Kelly’s death was suspended before it could begin by the then Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer. He used the Coroners Act to designate the Hutton Inquiry as ‘fulfilling the function of an inquest’.
News that the records will be kept secret comes just days before Mr Blair gives evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry on Friday.
To date, Dr Kelly’s name has scarcely been mentioned at the inquiry. One source who held a private meeting with Sir John Chilcot before the proceedings began said that Sir John had admitted he ‘did not want to touch the Kelly issue’ .
A spokesman for the Ministry of Justice said: ‘Any decision made by Lord Hutton at the time of his inquiry was entirely a matter for him.’
A spokesman for Thames Valley Police said yesterday that it would not be possible to search their records during the weekend.
The Mail on Sunday was unable to contact Lord Hutton.
La falsa reapertura es economizar por los McCann para seguír alimentando su bolsa y publicidad. Con tantas mentiras que han dicho los McCanes en la confesión caerían en sus propias redes, es imposible que pudiera dar ninguna orden de reabrir el caso porque seria la perdición del pederasta y de kate como complice de asesinato, mas su curita del alma que jamas levantarían sospecha para desacérse del cuerpo de Madeleine cementerio, todo esto ocurre por las incompetencias gubernativas de ambos países este caso se esta llevando con inmadurez y corrupción porque la decisión no debía de ser tomada por los McCann, sí por el gobierno que es de su competencia, entonces si que estas gentes entre comillas estarian en comisaria ahora mismo, y en 48 horas estarían listos para ser llevados a prisión. Porque aún todavía liarían más las cosas se contra decían con lo dicho puesto que ellos mismos se contra decían en el interrogatorio anterior ahora sería una bicoca para la policía y ellos no se van a someter a ese interrogatorio jamas, con que esta noticia de reabrir el caso es otra méntira los McCann quieren seguír con la bicoca y que con las contribuciones del pueblo seguir esplotando las cincuentenas de casos falsos entregados por la policía lusa para su propaganda y esplotación...
ReplyDeleteCopyright ©,.Miembro de la Organización Internacional de Derechos humanos...
*************************************************************************************
*************************************************************************************
FIRMADO:POR UN MEDIÚM-VIDENTE
El FBI nunca le ha hecho el asco a incluir en sus investigaciones a videntes y mediúm el cuerpo no ha aparecido porque está muerta y los culpables son los padres
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
!!!!!!!!!!!!De Donde Sacan La Inocencia kate y Gerry MCcann¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ !!!Que pinta Remenber en este asesinato y las demostraciones de retratos robot""" PROTAGONISMO y LUCRO"""¡¡¡ !!!OPeración task está en un blog que és Remenber el propietario ¡¡¡ !!!El significado de operacion task proviene de la policia de leicestershire¡¡¡ !!! Qué pinta Remenber con operación task en su blog ¡¡¡ !!!ESTAN DEMASIADO AL CORRIENTE DE LOS PASOS DE LA POLICIA EL PORTAVOZ DE LOS MCCANNN¡¡¡ !!! QUE PASA QUE LOS ASESINOS ES EL MUNDO Y LOS CULPABLES SON INECENTES¡¡¡ !!!Que pinta Remenber en este asesinato¡¡¡ . !!!Porque un portavoz¡¡¡ !!! y portavoz de que¡¡¡ Lo que estan haciendo es poner al corriente de las investigaciones al portavoz de los MCcann. Remenber angel de la muerte, Este señor no pinta nada entre las investigaciones de los MCcnann y la voz que puede aportar es el deseo absoluto de los MCcann las investigaciones operacion task tienen que estar muy lejos del alcance de este trio opracion task es un fraude y Máfia organizada corrupción...
!!!!!!!De adonde sacan los corruptos, la inocencia de los MCcann el sargento de scotland yard según dijo, le da la inmunidad nacional para no presentarse los MCcann en el juicio de Amaral ex-jefe de la policía lusa. Cuanto tubo que pagar Los MCcann para escuchar semejante burrada considerando que ellos son los asesino entre otras cosas.!!!!!!!"RENÚNCIA DEL CARGO Y DEL CUERPO EL PUESTO DE SARGENTO SE LE HACE MUY GRANDE" ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
Caso Madeleine McCann - Los McCann solo gastaron el 13,3% del Fondo Madeleine para encontrar a su hija.Visto bueno y despiste de los MCcann cara al mundo y crear fondos...
********************************************************************************************************
"UNA PISTA EL CURA ES LA PIEZA FUNDAMENTAL PARA SABER DEL CUERPO DE MAGGDÍE LA TERCERA PERSONA EN COLABORACION CON LOS MCCANN CEMENTERIO"